Workplace Drama Story
Four Days, Three Emails, and Not One of Them Sent
Part two of five. He wrote a furious one, a reasonable one and a nine-word one. What he did instead took two hours and changed how he felt.
Original fictional story. Written for World of Curious. The people and events in it are invented. Our fiction policy.
He did not say anything for four days.
He drafted three emails in that time and sent none of them, and he has kept all three, in a folder, which he accepts is not entirely healthy.
The first he wrote on the Tuesday night at about eleven, and it was furious, and it contained the phrase “frankly astonishing”, and he deleted it at ten past midnight without reading it back because he knew that if he read it back he would improve it, and an improved version of that email was still that email.
The second he wrote on Wednesday at lunchtime. It was reasonable. It was so reasonable that it was barely about anything. It used the words “just wanted to flag” and it was passive-aggressive in a way he could feel through the screen — the kind of email that makes the sender look small and the recipient look put-upon, and which would have been forwarded to somebody within the hour.
The third he wrote on Thursday morning and it was nine words long.
Karen — was there a reason you didn’t mention me?
He looked at it for a long time. It is, he still thinks, a good email. He did not send it either, and the reason he did not send it is the reason the whole rest of this happened.
He did not send it because he could not predict the answer.
That sounds like cowardice and he has decided it was not.
If she said “God, Ade, I’m so sorry, I completely — ” then fine, and it is over, and he has spent nine words.
But if she said what he suspected she would say — something smooth, something about the team, something that made the question itself look petty — then he had used up his one clean shot on an email she could answer in four words and never think about again.
So on Thursday afternoon he shut the email and opened his sent folder instead.
What he did was build a document.
It took two hours and it was, he says, the least emotional two hours of the entire business.
Every draft of the deck, with the date and time it was sent and who it was sent to. There were fourteen. The earliest was 3 May.
The email chain from June where he had proposed the cohort definition — the actual difficult intellectual bit, the thing the director had asked about — and where Karen had replied, at 9:12 the following morning: not sure about this, let me think.
The Saturday timestamps. Three of them, between 11:20 and 17:40 on 14 June, which was the day of the chart.
The message to Dominic in the team chat at 23:40 that night saying chart is finally behaving.
The calendar invite for the session where he had walked two colleagues through the methodology, with his name in the organiser field.
He put it in date order, with no commentary, and it came to four pages.
When it was finished he read it through once.
And the thing he had not expected, and the thing he now tells people about, is that reading it made him feel completely different.
For four days he had been carrying something that felt like a complaint — hot, slightly shameful, the kind of thing you rehearse in the car and then feel embarrassed about at traffic lights. And a complaint is a thing about you. It has your feelings in it. You cannot put it on a page without sounding like a person who wants something.
Four pages of dates are not about you at all.
He sat at his desk at twenty to seven in an empty office and felt, for the first time since the meeting, like a person rather than a grievance.
He slept properly on Thursday night and on Friday morning he did something he now describes as the last genuinely naive act of his professional life.
He asked Karen if she had ten minutes for a coffee.
She said yes immediately and suggested Monday.
He spent the weekend preparing. He went over the timeline until he could quote dates without looking. He worked out what he would say if she got upset, and what he would say if she got defensive, and what he would say if she simply agreed. He decided in advance that he would not raise his voice, that he would not say “stolen”, and that he would ask for one specific thing rather than an apology, because an apology cannot be verified and a specific thing can.
He was, he thought, extremely well prepared.
He was prepared for the wrong conversation entirely.
