Books & Authors Countdown

Nine Books That Were Nearly Very Different

Rejected manuscripts, changed titles, altered endings and pen names. Nine publishing decisions that reshaped books everybody now knows in one form only.

A branded card in rose pink introducing a list of nine books that were nearly published in a different form.
Davide Cantelli cant89 — CC0 — Wikimedia Commons

Publishing archives are one of the best correctives available to the romantic view of how books get written.

They contain rejection letters, editorial arguments, proof corrections, marketing memos and successive drafts, and they show something consistently different from the legend: books are made in stages, by several people, under commercial pressure.

Nine examples below, counting up to the pattern that runs through all of them.

  1. Number 9: The title that changed at the last minute

    Typesetting letterpress type
    Maggie Stephens from London, UK — CC BY 2.0 — Wikimedia Commons

    Working titles survive in publishing correspondence and in proof copies, and they are frequently much worse than the final version. Title changes are usually driven by the sales department rather than the author, which is a source of long-running friction.

  2. Number 8: The manuscript rejected many times over

    Typewritten manuscript pages
    Dalrymple, Alexander, 1737-1808 — Public domain — Wikimedia Commons

    Serial rejection is extremely common in the history of successful books, and the rejection letters survive in archives. What they usually show is not stupidity but risk aversion: editors declining something because they could not see how to sell it, which is a different judgement from thinking it was bad.

  3. Number 7: The pen name adopted for commercial reasons

    Book title page author name
    Creator unknown — Public domain — Wikimedia Commons

    Women writing under male or ambiguous names is the best-known case and continued well into the twentieth century. Authors also adopted pen names to publish in a second genre without confusing their readership, or because a contract prevented them publishing under their own name.

  4. Number 6: The ending changed after a bad reaction

    Handwritten manuscript corrections
    Sun, Shijun — Public domain — Wikimedia Commons

    Alternative endings exist in manuscript for a number of well-known novels, changed after a publisher's or a friend's response. In a few cases both versions were published in different territories, which produces genuine disagreement among readers about what the book says.

  5. Number 5: The book that was serialised first

    Magazine cover illustration 1900
    Uploader Hasanov Jasurbek — Public domain — Wikimedia Commons

    A large number of nineteenth-century novels were written and published in instalments, which shaped their structure enormously: recurring cliffhangers, large casts, and a pace calibrated to a monthly reading rhythm. Some were revised significantly for book publication.

  6. Number 4: The character that was cut

    Card artwork for entry number 4: The character that was cut.
    Illustration: World of Curious

    Surviving drafts frequently contain characters removed before publication, often for length. Where the manuscripts are held in public collections these are readable, and they sometimes explain oddities in the published text — a subplot that goes nowhere, a name mentioned once.

  7. Number 3: The book that was censored or bowdlerised

    Banned books display
    Charles Hackey — CC BY 2.0 — Wikimedia Commons

    Editions differ. Books have been altered for legal reasons, for moral objections, for particular markets and for school use, and the version someone read may not be the version someone else read. Checking which edition is being discussed is a basic and often-skipped step.

  8. Number 2: The book published after the author's death

    Author manuscript archive
    Baba Deep Singh — Public domain — Wikimedia Commons

    Posthumous publication raises a question that has no clean answer: whether an unfinished or unrevised manuscript represents what the author wanted. Several well-known works were published against explicit instructions to destroy them, which has been argued about ever since.

  9. And the strangest one of the lot

    Number 1: The thing archives keep proving — the myth of the sudden masterpiece

    Printing press type setting
    State Government Photographer — CC0 — Wikimedia Commons

    The single most consistent finding from publishing archives is how much work happens after the manuscript is finished. Editorial correspondence, marked-up proofs and multiple drafts show titles being argued over, structures rebuilt, characters removed, endings rewritten and openings replaced entirely. The popular image of a book arriving whole from a single mind, and being recognised immediately, is contradicted by almost every archive that has been catalogued. What survives instead is a long record of collaboration, disagreement, commercial pressure and revision — which is considerably more encouraging for anybody currently writing something.

Most of this material is publicly accessible. National libraries hold enormous quantities of literary correspondence and manuscripts, and much of it is now digitised.

Where this came from

  • Literary manuscripts and publishing archives — The British Library
  • Publishing history collections — Library of Congress
  • Literature reference — Encyclopaedia Britannica

Eight famous film production stories, and which ones hold up

A branded card in rose pink introducing an article checking eight widely repeated film production stories.
Myth or Fact

Eight Famous Film Production Stories, and Which Ones Hold Up

Film sets generate legends faster than any other workplace. Eight of the most repeated stories, sorted into the documented, the disputed and the invented.

Start it